Many evictions have been brutal, with little or no warning. Communities who once hunted, gathered, grazed livestock and farmed inside an area find themselves squatting on the outside, branded as poachers or criminals if they venture inside.
A statement from the Indigenous peoples’ Forum at an international conference in 2004 summed this up: ‘First we were dispossessed in the name of kings and emperors, later in the name of state development, and now in the name of conservation.’
Impacts of evictions
Communities are just as badly affected whether they lose their land to conservation projects, or other ‘developments’ such as mines and dams. Their health, livelihoods and culture suffer immeasurably.
Once self-sufficient and independent, conservation refugees typically find themselves dependent on hand-outs, divorced from the land and livelihoods which sustained them.
|Many Pygmy people in central Africa have suffered enormously as a result of being moved from their forests. |
This plunges the community into poverty and all that that entails – poor health, poor nutrition, severe distress and mental illness. Conservation refugees often find themselves on the receiving end of racism and discrimination from the authorities and/or the non-tribal society into which they are pushed.
A Twa widow from the area that is now Kahuzi-Biega National Park in DR Congo, described being evicted;
‘We did not know they were coming. Then suddenly one of them forced the door of our house and started shouting that we had to leave immediately because the park is not our land. I first did not understand what he was talking about because all my ancestors have lived on these lands.’
|Maasai at the cultural ‘manyatta’ of Maasai Mara Game Reserve, Kenya.
© Gianalberto Zanoletti/Survival
It should be no surprise then, that tribal communities that have been evicted from their lands go from being ‘the original conservationists’ to ‘enemies of conservation’ – as Maasai leader Martin Saning’o told a shocked group of conservationists.
Alienating communities from their lands in the name of conservation breeds poverty, resentment and anger – all of which undermine conservation.
The forest people
The Wanniyala-Aetto, or ‘forest people’, of Sri Lanka have been evicted from their former homeland in what is now the Maduru Oya National Park. In 1983 the government made their traditional livelihoods illegal.
The Wanniyala-Aetto had already lost much land to dams, settlers and logging. Maduru Oya was their last refuge.
Tapal Bandialetto, a Wanniyala-Aetto man, said, ‘If the next generation waits here, they will learn drinking, smoking and gambling. All the wrong things.
‘They must go back to the jungle while they are still young, and go back to the traditional system. We had our own system of medicine, of education. It is all being lost.’
A narrow escape
The Mursi of the Omo River valley in Ethiopia narrowly escaped a similar fate.
|Mursi, Southwest Ethiopia.
© Edward Mendell/Survival
In 2006 a Dutch organisation, Africa Parks Foundation (APF) signed a deal with the government which gave APF de facto policing powers, enabling them to criminalize the Mursi on their own land.
If our land is taken, it is like taking our lives.
An international outcry followed and Survival wrote to warn APF that it was complicit in the abuse of the rights of the Mursi and their neighbours. Shortly after, APF withdrew from the park.
Not moved, but barred
For many tribal peoples, the impact of a new park is not that they lose their homes, but that they lose land that is vitally important to them – barred from sacred sites or burial grounds; unable to access medicinal or sacred plants; unable to find sufficient resources for their daily lives.
|Mursi, Southwestern Ethiopia.
© Edward Mendell/Survival
Suddenly, the resources that the tribe has depended on are out of bounds. If they hunt in the park they are ‘poaching’. If they harvest the resources they have always used, they can be fined or imprisoned.
Some conservation projects compensate with ‘alternative livelihood schemes’, but too often these are insensitive to the needs and values of the tribe, reach too few families and are ‘too little, too late’.
Evicting or excluding tribal peoples from their traditional lands is morally and legally wrong and deeply damaging. Survival endorses the Bennett Code which calls on conservation organizations to sign up to a Code of Conduct barring them from working in areas where tribal peoples have been evicted.
It also gives tribal communities a way to seek justice if they consider they have been ill-treated by a conservation organization.
Download Bennett Code PDF 150kb